Rural development strategy to transform a forest village into an ecotourism destination. The road signage experience in San José de Cusmapa, Nicaragua

Authors

  • Pablo Martínez de Anguita Universidad Rey Juan Carlos - Campus de Móstoles: Mostoles, Madrid, ES
  • César David Gadea Herrera Máster en Desarrollo Rural. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Fundación Laudato Si.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62407/rciya.v2i2.106

Keywords:

Ecotourism, Google Earth, LandsCare, signaling of paths, ecotourism plan

Abstract

San José de Cusmapa, located in northern Nicaragua, is one of the poorest municipalities in the country. Situated at an altitude of 1,280 meters above sea level and covering a land area of 129.92 km², this municipality has a population of 7,983 residents, divided into urban (1,862) and rural (6,121) areas, according to INTUR (2023) data from the Tourism Map of Nicaragua. Positioned amidst natural reserves, San José de Cusmapa holds significant potential for developing ecotourism as a remedy for the prevailing local poverty. This article outlines the methodology used to mark and map trails (both on signs and online) as a fundamental component for any ecotourism proposal or plan. The objective of this work is to propose this methodology for any ecotourism project based on hiking trails in a simple, cost-effective, comprehensive, participatory, and replicable manner. The authors conclude that by combining this methodology with the two internet platforms they have: https://www.landscare.es; https://www.landscare.net/; created along with Google Earth, it is highly feasible and affordable to transform a forested village into an ecotourism destination.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2024-04-17

How to Cite

Martínez de Anguita, P. ., & Gadea Herrera, C. D. . (2024). Rural development strategy to transform a forest village into an ecotourism destination. The road signage experience in San José de Cusmapa, Nicaragua. Scientific Journal of Engineering and Architecture_iyA, 2(2), 109–117. https://doi.org/10.62407/rciya.v2i2.106